Monday, May 21, 2018

Grant Funding Strategies for CACs

Grant Funding Strategies for CACs

Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) provide great services to children who have been victimized. They provide a central focal point for counselors, advocates, medics, and law enforcement. CACs are a vital part of the social safety net. They rely on funding via grants mainly from three sources: the federal government, state governments, and private foundations. Funding to all 777 CACs in the United States amounted to $456 million in total in 2017. No CAC relies solely on government funding, either federal or state.  The amount of funds awarded via federal grants varies widely.

The U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) offer federal grants through different programs for CACs. Funding is subject to annual federal appropriations and changes to legislation can often be drastic. In recent years, CACs, like many other domestic programs, have seen the amount of available federal funding steadily decline However, receiving federal funding can lead to matching funds from other sources eager to fund a viable organization and thus serve as a basis for further funds.

Federal grants are often awarded to state governments who subsequently award grants to the individual CACs. In addition, the National Children’s Alliance, the trade association for CACs, also awards grants to CACs. Funding received from a grant must be used for its intended purpose. All grant applications must be submitted by a strict deadline.

There are a number of federal grants made to states available to CACs. States have wide latitude and discretion over the distribution of federal grants.  Examples include funds from the Criminal Justice Act (CJA), the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA), and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF).
The DOJ’s Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) and Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Programs (OJJDP) administer the majority of available grants, including subgrants received via the NCA which are in turn given to states. OVC administers grants through the federal VOCA and the state's Criminal Justice Improvement account, both of which are funded through fines, fees and surcharges paid by certain offenders after conviction in state or federal court. VOCA provide funds to services provided to victims as well as compensation.

The federal grant funding process itself is very complex. The preliminary steps include:

1.                  Funding Opportunity Announcement
2.                  Application Review Process
3.                  Funding Opportunity Announcement

Agencies announce Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOA) based on the related legislation and their budget. FOA includes all the information for an applicant to assess their eligibility for grants. Applicants can search on for opportunities. To be eligible you must register on the site and go through the process. It is a time consuming process that must be completed prior to completing the application.

The application process itself is lengthy. The purpose of the grant must be described in detail. Every grant has its own specific requirements that must be adhered to. The application is sent through It includes:

1. Information to Complete the Application for Federal Assistance
2. A Statement Regarding Use of Administrative and Training Funds
3. Certification of State Eligibility Requirements Statement
4. A Statement Regarding Collecting the Data Required for This Solicitation Performance Measures
5. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire (including applicant disclosure of high-risk status)
6. Applicant Disclosure of Pending Applications
7. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
8. Statement Regarding Plan To Subgrant Funds
9. List of Staff Positions Paid With VOCA Victim Assistance Administrative Funds
10. Information on Proposed Subawards (if any), and on Proposed Procurement Contracts (if any
11. Monitoring of Subawards
12. Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable)

After submission, applications are reviewed in the following manner:

1.                  Initial screening to ensure application is complete
2.                  Programmatic review and assessment of the substance of the applications
3.                  Financial review of proposed budgets
4.                  Award decision and announcement
5.                  Initial Screening of Application

Grants exclusively available on the state level can be found on Currently, 32 states have passed legislation regarding CAC funding. States administer grants based on both the general revenue the state receives through the usual means of taxation and special revenue that is funded via fees and penalties of convicted criminals. These funds are usually administered via an Office of Victim Services.

Twelve states have dedicated special revenue to CAC funding. They are available through a variety of agencies including Departments of Health, Attorneys General, Health and Human Services, and Departments of Children’s Services, and local law enforcement.

Wednesday, May 16, 2018

Latino Action Network Condemns Kim Guadagno’s Anti-Immigrant TV Advertisement and Debate Statement


Contact: Daniel Ulloa
(908) 421-1422
October 12, 2017

Latino Action Network Condemns Kim Guadagno’s Anti-Immigrant TV Advertisement
and Debate Statement

NEWARK- Gubernatorial candidate Kim Guadagno released a TV ad last night reiterating her statement
from the first gubernatorial debate referring to undocumented immigrants as “murderers and rapists”,
using disparaging language that is similar to that used by Donald Trump. The Latino Action Network
publicly condemned Guadagno’s comments.

“Phil Murphy was very clear in the debate that he condemns murderous acts committed by anyone and
that the people who commit those crimes should be prosecuted,” said Chris Estevez, President of the
Latino Action Network. “Guadagno's Trump-like approach paints all immigrants and Latinos as
murderers and rapists.”

“Studies show that immigrants have been less likely than the native born to be criminals for about the
past century,” said Rudy Rodas, LAN Immigration Committee Chair. “Like other law abiding New
Jerseyans, they contribute to our economy and are integral members of our communities.”

“We have faith that New Jersey voters are intelligent people who won't fall for Kim Guadagno's Donald
Trump impersonation and her hateful speech toward immigrants.” concluded Estevez.

LAN is a broad, statewide coalition of Latino organizations dedicated to political empowerment, the
promotion of civil rights, and the elimination of disparities in the areas of education, health, and
employment. It was founded in 2009.

Monday, February 5, 2018

Professional Writing and Editing Services for All!


I am a former reporter with experience in Public Relations. I also have a Master's degree. I have 7 years of experience in writing, editing, and proofreading. I am experienced in editing final papers for college students. 

I specialize in:

College papers for undergraduate and graduate students.
Blog posts

Other projects are available by request.

Base pay is $30 an hour. High-speed delivery. Email me at if you're interested.

Monday, July 17, 2017

Transit Delays are a Symptom of a Larger Problem

NJ Transit train problems
NJ Transit has plagued with problems for years
Commuters via NJ Transit to New York Penn Station this morning were subject to an extra 20 minute delay due to a switch problem on Amtrak’s line. In addition, an Amtrak train hit a person near Milltown, NJ which also caused delays. None of the passengers on the train were hurt.

Amtrak began work on repairs its tracks Monday that will continue throughout the summer, ending September 10th.  Trains on the Morris & Essex line will now end at Newark Penn Station instead of New York Penn Station while repairs are ongoing.

PATH trains and ferries will honor NJ Transit ticket holders for the duration of the repairs. The increased options for public transit to New York made the first day better than many expected. Unfortunately, some of the extra buses provided Monday will not be a transit option going forward.

Getting into New York Penn Station already takes more than an hour from most stations in New Jersey that are close as the crow flies. However, due to the state of the tunnel and the tracks, trains are unable to go faster than a glacial pace quite often.

The system is so old there have been several train derailments already this year. Thus, repairs due to age as well as Hurricane Sandy are urgently needed. But they have been delayed for so long the entire system is crumbling.

NJ Transit is already operating at a diminished capacity due to the massive budget cuts it sustained under Chris Christie, having gone from a $350 million a year budget in 2005 to a $33 million a year budget in 2015.

When New Jersey raised the gas tax last year to address its transit woes, it did so at the expense of the estate tax. The estate tax, which especially affects the wealthy, will be eliminated next year, thus making the tax system worse for the average New Jerseyan. And this was a deal that was finalized only after months of negotiation.

During his campaign, Trump pledged to spend more on public infrastructure. However, his most recent proposal would cut infrastructure spending. To address the issue, Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Cory Booker (D-NJ) have been pushing the Gateway project for quite some time while funding problems persist due to opposition from Republicans. The project would double the capacity of NJ Transit and Amtrak which would reduce travel time.

The poor state of our infrastructure is a subject of great political contention and has been so for some time. When a politician gives a speech declaring the need for a new bridge or road, some reactionary polemic will inevitably call him a “socialist”. However, a strong infrastructure is one of the qualities that define many industrialized, capitalist countries versus third world nations.

The poor state of our infrastructure is merely another symptom of runaway inequality and how the wealthy and their conservative allies have hallowed out our society. Transportation of course is merely one part of the U.S. domestic budget that is considerably underfunded due to austerity measures and tax loopholes favoring large corporations at the expense of the average taxpayer.

Of course, the irony is that if at some point, infrastructure funding increases dramatically and new projects pop up everywhere, the delays will be nearly as dreadful as those faced on the daily commute, at least temporarily.

Thursday, April 20, 2017

Bill O’Reilly Being Paid $25 Million for Leaving Show

Bill O'Reilly has been let go from Fox News after they have been
forced to settle sexual harassment lawsuits with multiple women.
Fox News host Bill O’Reilly is going to be paid $25 million to step down from his prime time cable news show “The O’Reilly Factor” on Fox News by its parent company, News Corp. The $25 million represents one year of his salary which News Corp. is obliged to pay him as per his contract.

O’Reilly is being forced out after allegations of sexual harassment have risen from multiple women including reportedly calling an African American woman “hot chocolate”.

News Corp. has already paid $13 million to five women who were guests or staff on the show.

The O’Reilly Factor has consistently been the most popular evening news program on cable television for 15 years. O’Reilly continues to deny that he sexually harassed any women.

Fox News would have likely kept O’Reilly in his primetime slot if several prominent corporations hadn’t pulled their ads from the show making O’Reilly a financial liability. Among the fifty advertisers who severed their ties due to the sexual harassment suit included several auto, insurance, and major pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer.

He has served as the titular host of the “O’Reilly Factor” since 1996, the year Fox News was launched.

O’Reilly more than any other media figure has shaped political debate for the worse during his tenure. He claimed to be in the “No Spin Zone” has done nothing but spin facts to suit his conservative viewpoint. In fact, he can be called the “Godfather” of Fake News. He passionately insisted that Saddam Hussein was allied with Al Qaeda. He assets that climate change is not real, and that Black Lives Matter is a hate group,as one of his many bogus claims, all of which are unfounded assertions designed to scare viewers, cause controversy, and boost ratings.

This hypocritical figure who has claimed to stand for “traditional values” has done nothing of the sort. He mocked those who would criticized George W. Bush’s push towards the Iraq War which has since destabilized the Middle East and created a power vacuum that has been filled by figures far worse than Saddam Hussein.

In light of all this, it even more galling that his ratings didn’t suffer from the allegations. In fact, O'Reilly's downfall has been a long time coming. Many allege he lied about being saving a colleague during the Falklands war in the 1980’s.

O’Reilly’s obnoxious, faux populist, reactionary and rhetoric arguably enabled the rise of conservative figures for the last 20 years including George W. Bush, the Tea Party, and Donald Trump. In fact, O’Reilly has been a consistent fan of Trump on air, supporting most of his controversial and remarks and defending him from critics. The two are personally close, having attended baseball games together.

Trump returned the favor to O’Reilly by coming out in support of him earlier this month saying he was a “good person” when controversy first arose around O’Reilly.

O’Reilly’s self-righteous pose and bluster inspired Stephen Colbert’s bombastically foolish character on the “Colbert Report”. He has ultimately poisoned American political discourse for years to come.

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Georgia Special Election Might Embarrass Trump Tonight

Jon Ossoff, GA Democratic congressional candidate
Jon Ossoff, the 30-year old Congressional candidate might
upset the political order with a win in his race for an empty seat
A special election today for Georgia’s 6th Congressional district might be won by a Democrat. The seat was vacated by Tom Price who was made Secretary of Health and Human Services by Trump. The Democratic nominee is Jon Ossoff, a 30- year old small businessman and former congressional staffer.

Ossoff has run a strong campaign for the seat declaring his candidacy in January. He made headlines when he sent an email saying, “Make Trump Furious” framing his election as a dent in Trump or part of “the Resistance”. He has been able to raise more than $8.3 million for the special election which has led many to take notice. That’s 17 times more than his closest opponent. Less than half a million came from within Georgia itself, though the near 200,000 donations averaged $43 per donor suggesting that a legitimate virtual grassroots network is propelling Ossoff versus receiving funding from a few large donors.

In addition to raising huge sums of money, Ossoff has been polling near 40% in recent days.  However, his success has made National Republicans kick into high gear. It’s well-publicized that he doesn’t currently live in the district, despite having been raised there. In addition, Trump recorded a robocall criticizing Ossoff that was sent out yesterday. $2.2 million has been spent by Republican PACs criticizing his age and allegations that he padded his resume his time as a congressional staffer

While his opponents have been portraying his age as a liability, he might be able to turn that into an advantage. Twenty-seven percent of registered voters in the district are between the ages of 18 and 34 and thus might be welcome a fellow Millennial as their Congressman.

Due in part to the nature of Georgia’s election rules, there are 17 other candidates running against Ossoff for the seat, including multiple Republicans. Thus, it’s likely the top vote-getters will compete in a runoff scheduled for June 20th. At that point, it might be far more difficult for Ossoff to compete against a single Republican backed a by a united party and funded by mega-donors.

Georgia’s 6th district, situated outside Atlanta, is staunchly conservative and quite wealthy. It was formerly held by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich while in Congress. Price himself was also extremely conservative while in Congress and recently led the failed efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act as HHS Secretary. But while the district has been historically Republican, Trump only won it by 1.5 percent.  

A win tonight would reinvigorate the Democratic Party which has been struggling to recover in the wake of Trump’s victory last November. It would likely be seen as a sign that the party has been reinvigorated by its time in the opposition and can expect support in many formerly solid Republican districts.

Many diehards Democrats are especially anxious to see this election as the turning point against Trump. In the recent Kansas election to replace CIA Director Mike Pompeo, James Thompson, the Democratic candidate came extremely close to winning the seat with 46 percent of the vote despite receiving little support from the national party. It should be noted Ossoff has tried to portray himself as a near centrist in contrast to Thompson who portrayed himself being more in the mold of a Bernie Sanders progressive.

However, Georgia’s 6th district is not the ideal place to hold a special election that will be the turning point against Trump. The fact that the district has been held by Republicans since the Carter Administration doesn’t bode well in attempts to win it in the first place let alone hold the seat in the upcoming midterm elections. In fact, it has been 21 years since a Democrat won at least 40 percent of the vote in the district. There are far more districts throughout the Midwest which were held by a Democrat at one point during the Obama Administration where Democrats have performed better in the past. But if Ossoff does ultimately win the race, then Trump and the Republicans are going to be doomed sooner than expected.